Claim [1] rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim [2] of U.S. Patent No. [3] . Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because [4] .
Claim [1] rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim [2] of U.S. Patent No. [3] . Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because [4] .