Applicant’s election with traverse of [1] in the reply filed on [2] is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that [3] . This is not found persuasive because [4] . The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL.
Applicant’s election with traverse of [1] in the reply filed on [2] is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that [3] . This is not found persuasive because [4] . The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL.