Yita LLC v. MacNeil IP LLC
69 F.4th 13562023 USPQ2d 667Fed. Cir.
AI-generated holding
Objective evidence of nonobviousness requires a nexus to the claimed invention; nexus is lacking where the secondary-considerations evidence relates only to a feature that was known in the prior art.
- Written by
- A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.
- Confidence
- high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate
- Human review
- Not reviewed by a person
Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error
Cited by the manual
2 sections