Uber Techs., Inc. v. X One, Inc.

A specification's silence on how a step is achieved may suggest that accomplishing it was within the ordinary skill in the art; combining two predictable, known solutions in the art is not impermissible hindsight for obviousness purposes.

Written by

A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.

Confidence

high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate

Human review

Not reviewed by a person

Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error