Tas v. Beachy

626 Fed. App'x. 999Fed. Cir.

AI-generated holding

An interference exists if the subject matter of a claim of one party would, if prior art, have anticipated or rendered obvious the subject matter of a claim of the opposing party, and vice versa.

Written by: A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.
Confidence: high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate
Human review: Not reviewed by a person

Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error

Cited by the manual

1 section

§ 2301.03

Interference Proceedings

“an interference exists if the subject matter of a claim of one party would, if prior art, have anticipated or rendered obvious the subject matter of a claim of the opposing party and vice versa”

→