Tas v. Beachy

626 Fed. App'x. 999Fed. Cir.

AI-generated holding

An interference exists if the subject matter of a claim of one party would, if prior art, have anticipated or rendered obvious the subject matter of a claim of the opposing party, and vice versa.

Generated summary for orientation only — not legal advice. Verify against the opinion.

Cited by the manual

1 section

§ 2301.03

Interference Proceedings

“an interference exists if the subject matter of a claim of one party would, if prior art, have anticipated or rendered obvious the subject matter of a claim of the opposing party and vice versa”

→