Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Gilead Scis., Inc.
61 F.4th 13502023 USPQ2d 269Fed. Cir.
AI-generated holding
Benefit of an earlier filing date under 35 U.S.C. 120 requires that each prior-filed application provide written description support for the later claims; a claimed subgenus is unsupported where the earlier applications contain neither ipsis verbis disclosure nor sufficient blaze marks under 35 U.S.C. 112(a).
- Written by
- A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.
- Confidence
- high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate
- Human review
- Not reviewed by a person
Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error
Cited by the manual
4 sections§ 211.05→§ 2163→§ 2163.03→§ 2163.05→
Claiming the Benefit of an Earlier Filing Date Under 35 U.S.C. 120 and 119(e)
1 mention
Guidelines for the Examination of Patent Applications Under the 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, “Written Description” Requirement
1 mention
Guidelines for the Examination of Patent Applications Under the 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, “Written Description” Requirement
1 mention
Guidelines for the Examination of Patent Applications Under the 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, “Written Description” Requirement
1 mention