Pac. Biosciences of Cal., Inc. v. Oxford Nanopore Techs., Inc.
996 F.3d 13422021 USPQ2d 519Fed. Cir.
AI-generated holding
Claims lack enablement where undue experimentation is required to practice their full scope, as where relevant artisans would know how to perform the invention over only a narrow range of the claimed scope and no actual reduction to practice rebuts that showing.
- Written by
- A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.
- Confidence
- high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate
- Human review
- Not reviewed by a person
Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error
Cited by the manual
5 sections§ 2164.05→§ 2164.05(a)→§ 2164.05(b)→§ 2164.06→§ 2164.08→
The Enablement Requirement
“undue experimentation needed to enable full claim scope”
The Enablement Requirement
“undue experimentation needed to enable full claim scope”
The Enablement Requirement
“undue experimentation needed to enable full claim scope”
The Enablement Requirement
“undue experimentation needed to enable full claim scope”
The Enablement Requirement
“undue experimentation needed to enable full claim scope”