McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games Am. Inc.
959 F.3d 10912020 USPQ2d 10550Fed. Cir.
AI-generated holding
Illustrates the requirement that a specification enable the full scope of the claimed invention without undue experimentation, applied outside the life sciences as an example of enablement analysis across technology areas.
- Written by
- A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.
- Confidence
- medium — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate
- Human review
- Not reviewed by a person
Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error
Cited by the manual
2 sectionsDiscussed in USPTO guidance
- Reminders on Evaluating Subject Matter Eligibility of Claims under 35 U.S.C. 101Memorandum · USPTO (Deputy Commissioner for Patents) · 2025-08-04
- Ex parte Desjardins, Appeal 2024-000567 (Appeals Review Panel, Sept. 26, 2025) — precedentialPrecedential decision · USPTO Appeals Review Panel (Director Squires) · 2025-09-26
- Advance Notice of Change to the MPEP in Light of Ex parte DesjardinsAdvance notice of change to the MPEP · USPTO · 2025-12-05
USPTO guidance issued after the pinned MPEP revision that cites this case.