In re Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litigation

Courts have looked to whether a reissue applicant was diligent in correcting the errors in the patent, even for narrowing reissues; on the facts, the applicant was found diligent despite a multi-year delay after learning of an invalidating reference.

Written by

A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.

Confidence

high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate

Human review

Not reviewed by a person

Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error