In re Omeprazole Patent Litigation
536 F.3d 136187 USPQ2d 1865Fed. Cir.
AI-generated holding
Claims may be nonobvious despite an argument to combine prior art elements—as with a drug formulation using enteric coatings—where the prior art does not supply an adequate reason or expectation of success for the combination.
- Written by
- A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.
- Confidence
- medium — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate
- Human review
- Not reviewed by a person
Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error
Cited by the manual
1 section