In re Lee
199 USPQ 108Comm'r Pat.
AI-generated holding
Restriction should not be required where there is an express admission that the claimed inventions would have been obvious over each other within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 103.
- Written by
- A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.
- Confidence
- high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate
- Human review
- Not reviewed by a person
Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error
Cited by the manual
1 section