mpep.io

In re Kelly

305 F.2d 909134 USPQ 397CCPA
AI-generated holding

There is no per se rule against double inclusion of an element in a claim; the governing consideration is what constitutes a reasonable construction of the claim language, since automatic reliance on a rule either against or allowing double inclusion leads to unreasonable interpretations.

Generated summary for orientation only — not legal advice. Verify against the opinion.