In re Kelly
305 F.2d 909134 USPQ 397CCPA
AI-generated holding
There is no per se rule against double inclusion of an element in a claim; the governing consideration is what constitutes a reasonable construction of the claim language, since automatic reliance on a rule either against or allowing double inclusion leads to unreasonable interpretations.
Generated summary for orientation only — not legal advice. Verify against the opinion.
Cited by the manual
1 section