Hull v. Bonis

There is no doctrine of equivalents in proving actual reduction to practice of an interference count; the remedy for proofs that do not match the count is a preliminary motion to amend the count to conform to the proofs.

Written by

A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.

Confidence

high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate

Human review

Not reviewed by a person

Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error