Gunn v. Bosch

Diligence requires activity directed to reducing to practice the subject matter of the counts; a fortuitous reduction to practice occurring while working on a different invention is inconsistent with the continuous intent or effort that diligence demands.

Written by

A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.

Confidence

high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate

Human review

Not reviewed by a person

Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error