Ex parte Stevens

An asserted utility of treating human cancer may properly be viewed as incredible when the state of the art at the time of the invention does not support the assertion, rendering the claimed utility unpatentable.

Written by

A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.

Confidence

high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate

Human review

Not reviewed by a person

Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error