Ex parte Sasajima
212 USPQ 103BPAI
AI-generated holding
Evidence of unexpected results relating to a property not disclosed in the original application, such as the relative toxicity of a claimed pharmaceutical compound, must still be considered in evaluating nonobviousness.
- Written by
- A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.
- Confidence
- high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate
- Human review
- Not reviewed by a person
Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error
Cited by the manual
1 section