Ex parte Rubin

Reversing the order of process steps disclosed in the prior art is prima facie obvious; claims to making a laminated sheet by performing the prior art coating and impregnating steps in reverse sequence were unpatentable.

Written by

A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.

Confidence

high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate

Human review

Not reviewed by a person

Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error