Ex parte Levy
17 USPQ2d 1461BPAI
AI-generated holding
In relying on inherency, an examiner must provide a basis in fact or technical reasoning reasonably supporting the determination that the allegedly inherent characteristic necessarily flows from the teachings of the applied prior art.
- Written by
- A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.
- Confidence
- high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate
- Human review
- Not reviewed by a person
Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error