Ex parte Lee
31 USPQ2d 1105BPAI
AI-generated holding
When it is unclear whether a prior art reference teaches a claimed range with sufficient specificity, a combined anticipation and obviousness rejection is permitted, and the examiner must provide reasons for anticipation as well as a reasoned statement of obviousness.
Generated summary for orientation only — not legal advice. Verify against the opinion.
Cited by the manual
1 section