mpep.io

Ex parte Humber

217 USPQ 265BPAI
AI-generated holding

An applicant may rebut a prima facie case of obviousness by comparing the claimed invention against prior art closer to the invention than the art the examiner relied on; unexpected results shown over such closer compounds are probative.

Written by
A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.
Confidence
high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate
Human review
Not reviewed by a person

Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error