Ex parte Huber

A claim does not necessarily fail the definiteness requirement merely because the claimed elements do not function simultaneously, are not directly functionally related, do not directly intercooperate, or serve independent purposes.

Written by

A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.

Confidence

high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate

Human review

Not reviewed by a person

Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error