Ex parte Gwinn
112 USPQ 439BPAI
AI-generated holding
Claims to a set of dice differing from the prior art solely in printed matter were properly rejected because there was no new feature of physical structure and no new relation of the printed matter to the physical structure.
- Written by
- A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.
- Confidence
- high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate
- Human review
- Not reviewed by a person
Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error
Cited by the manual
1 section