Ex parte Frye

Appeal brief arguments must explain why the examiner erred as to each contested ground of rejection; a statement that merely points out what a claim recites is not considered an argument for patentability.

Written by

A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.

Confidence

high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate

Human review

Not reviewed by a person

Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error