Ex parte Clark
174 USPQ 40BPAI
AI-generated holding
Whether multiple inclusion of one or more elements in a claim gives rise to indefiniteness must be evaluated on the facts of each case; older decisions disfavoring double inclusion are applied with care rather than as an automatic rule.
- Written by
- A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.
- Confidence
- medium — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate
- Human review
- Not reviewed by a person
Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error
Cited by the manual
1 section