mpep.io

Ex parte Clark

174 USPQ 40BPAI
AI-generated holding

Whether multiple inclusion of one or more elements in a claim gives rise to indefiniteness must be evaluated on the facts of each case; older decisions disfavoring double inclusion are applied with care rather than as an automatic rule.

Written by
A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.
Confidence
medium — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate
Human review
Not reviewed by a person

Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error