Ex parte Billottet

The mere fact that a claim recites the use of various components, each arguably old, does not provide a proper basis for a derivation rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(f).

Written by

A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.

Confidence

high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate

Human review

Not reviewed by a person

Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error