Eli Lilly & Co. v. Teva Pharms. Int’l GmbH
8 F.4th 13312021 USPQ2d 862Fed. Cir.
AI-generated holding
A finding that a patent challenger demonstrated a motivation to combine references does not necessarily establish that the challenger also met its burden of showing a reasonable expectation of success in achieving the claimed method of treatment.
- Written by
- A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.
- Confidence
- high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate
- Human review
- Not reviewed by a person
Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error
Cited by the manual
1 section