Corephotonics, Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
84 F.4th 9902023 USPQ2d 1202Fed. Cir.
AI-generated holding
When multiple prior art references are combined in an obviousness rejection, each reference must be analogous art to the claimed invention, but the references need not be analogous art to each other.
- Written by
- A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.
- Confidence
- high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate
- Human review
- Not reviewed by a person
Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error
Cited by the manual
1 section