B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. C&D Zodiac, Inc.
962 F.3d 13732020 USPQ2d 10706Fed. Cir.
AI-generated holding
A claim would have been obvious where all claimed elements were known in the prior art, a skilled artisan could have combined them as claimed by known methods with no change in their respective functions, and the combination yielded nothing more than predictable results.
- Written by
- A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.
- Confidence
- high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate
- Human review
- Not reviewed by a person
Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error
Cited by the manual
1 section