Adler v. Kluver

When denial of a motion to substitute a broader interference count rests on a holding that the limitation to be deleted was material to the opponent patentee, the proposed count is not interfering subject matter, and the applicant may file a Rule 131 affidavit to antedate the reference.

Written by

A language model, from how the MPEP uses this case rather than from the opinion.

Confidence

high — self-reported, not calibrated against a measured error rate

Human review

Not reviewed by a person

Read the opinion before relying on this in a filing. How these are made · Report an error